I have not been able to confirm this report, but it is certainly interesting. We know that Chertoff, who heads up Homeland Security, is a Jewish Zionist. We know that the neoconservative movement is, in large part, simply Zionism by another name. We know the Zionists in the US media were crucial to selling the 9/11 treason and the global war against Afghanistan and Iraq (and now Iran).
I have no problem with the United States electorate, asking strong questions about the loyalties of John F. Kennedy as he, a Catholic, ran for the presidency in 1960. I believe it's only prudent to consider the current candidacy of Mitt Romney with a consideration of his status as a Mormon. Is it prejudiced, bigoted or unreasonable to have doubts, even fears about the appointment of so many Jews to positions prominence in the Bush administration -- especially positions that will become crucial if Bush is to establish an outright tyranny through dictatorship?
I'm not anti-Semitic, but neither am I stupid. I want to see more facts about this latest Bush League appointment, including whether or not he is Jewish. By the article and link below. It is quite clear that he is playing ball with the demonization of Arabs, which is the foundation of the global war on terror. I need to read his op-ed from the Wall Street Journal, which is also cited. My gut feeling is that this guy is a Zionazi. CPTMAY
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:43:50 -0700
From: feenyite1@...
Subject: Bush Names Top Jew As Attorney General
To: stoptheneokahns@yahoogroups.com
Bush Names Jew as Attorney General Posted by admin on: 2007-09-18 07:04:44 in category: General [ Print] 
President George W Bush wants prominent New York Jew Michael B. Mukasey as next attorney general.Should the Senate confirm him, Mukasey would become the third attorney general to serve under Mr. Bush. As the top law enforcement officer in the United States, he would preside over a Justice Department.Mukasey’s handling of the case of Jose Padilla, an American citizen suspected of membership in Al Qaeda, has attracted particular notice from critics of the Bush administration. Although Mr. Mukasey backed the White House by ruling that Mr. Padilla could be held as an enemy combatant — a decision overturned on appeal — he also defied the administration by saying Mr. Padilla was entitled to legal counsel.In 1993, Mr. Mukasey presided over the trial of Omar Abdel Rahman, the so-called Blind Sheik, whom he sentenced to life in prison for his role in a plot to blow up New York landmarks and tunnels. Mr. Mukasey had a reputation for decisions that were largely supportive of law enforcement that often brought criticism from civil-liberty advocates.He has spoken in support of provisions of the Patriot Act, and last month wrote an op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal on “the inadequacy of the current approach to terrorism prosecutions,” a view that the Bush administration has expressed.News Source: NAN 
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
Make your little one a shining star! Shine on!
Offline 
Send Email